If a reviewer writes about “feelings, thoughts, impulses” as though those are interchangeable categories, they’ve collapsed the very distinctions Rusty Ruins the Fort and Other Important Things is attempting to make.

Those aren’t the same thing:

  • Feeling/emotion: an affective experience.
  • Thought: mental content—an idea, interpretation, memory, prediction, etc.
  • Impulse: a push toward an action.
  • Reaction: what actually happens in response—internally or behaviorally.

And your whole premise depends on not treating those as one undifferentiated blob.

So when the review describes the Flickerlings as:

“the different feelings, thoughts, impulses we have swirling around in our head”

that’s actually revealing something important. The reviewer has merged categories that your framework deliberately separates.

They’re reading the book through the conventional assumption:

everything happening inside us = feelings/emotions.

Whereas your framework is trying to make the reader notice:

something happens → an emotional response occurs → different internal processes can arise → some push toward action → we can notice them before acting.

That’s not a semantic distinction. That’s the intellectual foundation of Impulse Intelligence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DOES EVIDENCE SHOW TRAINING IN IMPULSE CONTROL Helps Prevent Violent Aggression? The evidence is strongest for reducing aggression and improving self-regulation , rather than proving that impulse-control training prevents an individual murder or stabbing. A few particularly relevant findings: A systematic review/meta-analysis of 49 randomized trials involving 23,098 children and adolescents found that self-regulation interventions improved self-regulation, and reported improvements in behavioral problems, conduct disorders, and school suspensions among the studies measuring those outcomes.   https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2677898?utm_source=chatgpt.com#google_vignette  A randomized trial of 790 elementary-school children tested Second Step , a violence-prevention curriculum that explicitly taught anger management, impulse control, and empathy . Classroom observations showed a significant reduction in physical aggression , with most effects ...
Read more
  Introducing Impulse Intelligence™ We teach children not only about emotions, but also—and more importantly—what happens after the emotion: that gripping impulse that rises and feels like something they have to do. The Flickerlings approach teaches: EVENT → EMOTION → RECOGNIZE → NAME THE IMPULSE → PAUSE → CHOICE Impulse Intelligence™ gives children a way to recognize and name those impulses before they become actions. The Flickerlings make those invisible impulses visible—and give children a language for talking about them. This is the foundation of the Flickerling program.
Read more
 Impulse intelligence THE FLICKERLING DIFFERENCE Most programs teach: EVENT → EMOTION → REGULATE The missing piece: They often move from emotion directly to regulation without explicitly teaching the child to recognize and understand the impulse that comes between feeling and action. THE FLICKERLING DIFFERENCE teaches: EVENT → EMOTION → RECOGNIZE → NAME THE IMPULSE → PAUSE → CHOICE The child learns to recognize the impulse, name it, pause, and decide whether to act on it. Core idea: You can’t control an impulse you can’t recognize and name. FLICKERLINGS: A READING-BASED IMPULSE INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM The  B ridge between cute children’s book  and this is an actual program. Children read the story. 
 They meet the Flickerlings. 
 They hear the impulses out loud. 
 Then they learn to recognize, name, pause, and choose. Then give each adult a very clear job. TEACHERS Your role isn’t to lecture children about impulse control. You read the story and facilitate ...
Read more